All models

ByteDanceChina· released Jun 2026

Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo

Provisional: 4 comparable tests so far. Ranked once it reaches 6 across 2 counting categories.

ByteDance, China. One of 4 models from this lab on the Index.

Third-party publishedLow confidence (thin coverage)

Snapshot November 10, 2026

OpenCharts Index

62.4

Provisional: not enough comparable tests or counting categories to rank yet · 4 comparable tests · 0 counting categories

Drop any single test and the Index lands between 45.6 and 77.8.

—HARD SET

Needs more results (0 of 5 so far)

Distance to today's frontier on the hardest tests. Not a measure of intelligence.

What it's known for

Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo, in 4 results.

Its widest gap is on Chess Puzzles, 71.6% behind the best published result. No comparable results yet in coding, agentic, multimodal and human preference. Between 35% and 40% behind the best published results, on average.

Strongest category

No category counts yet: a category counts once it has more than one comparable test and the model has taken at least half of them. The scores it has are below.

Best single result

Mock AIME 2024–2025

Solve competition mathematics problems that have a single exact integer answer.

96.1%

96.1% of the best (100.0%) · #35 of 98.

Olympiad-style problems need long, careful chains of reasoning, and there is no partial credit.

Where it trails

Chess Puzzles

Find the single best move in a chess position that is given as text, with no engine to consult.

26.0%

71.6% behind the best published result (79.0%), measured above chance · #53 of 76.

A small probe of planning and spatial reasoning. There is one right answer and no partial credit, so a lucky guess is rare.

Not measured yet

No comparable result yet in these 4 categories. A blank is a blank, never a zero, and it does not lower the Index.

  • Coding
  • Agentic
  • Multimodal
  • Human preference

Covered, but not averaged into the Index:

  • Reasoning2 of 8 tests · needs 4 · mean 59.5
  • Knowledgesingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 31.6
  • Math1 of 4 tests · needs 2 · mean 96.1
Every score, with its source

See it at work

What Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo was asked to do, and how it did.

Every test it has taken, by category, with the kind of task it faced, who produced the number and where the result landed against the best published one. The examples are original and illustrative, never items from the datasets themselves.

Math · mean 96.1 across 1 comparable test · not counted toward the Index yet (fewer than half the category's tests)

Solve competition mathematics problems that have a single exact integer answer.

96.1%

96.1% of the best (100.0%)
#35 of 98 · n = 45

high

45 problems: one problem is 2.2 points, so gaps of a few points are within noise.

Source: Epoch AI (internal runs)

Every result is read against the best published one on its test: percent scores as a share of the best above chance, Arena ratings as the expected win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. Sitting a harder exam never lowers a model. Every number links to the publisher that produced it.

Head to head

Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo against whoever you pick.

Choose a rival. Every counted test both have taken appears side by side as a share of the best published result on that test, with the category means above. A win is a higher share; a gap under 2 points is a tie, because one item on a 45-problem exam is 2.2 points and publishers' own standard errors are of that order.

Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo

provisional·Index 62.4C

0 : 4

wins · 0 ties · 4 shared

GPT-6 Astra

#1·Index 93.7A

GPT-6 Astra comes out ahead on 4 of the 4 tests both have taken.

Category means

  • Reasoning

    59.5
    96.1
  • Knowledge

    31.6
    80.4
  • Coding

    —
    93.4
  • Math

    96.1
    98.8
  • Agentic

    —
    90.6
  • Multimodal

    —
    89.6
  • Human preference

    —
    85.2

Shared tests · biggest gaps first

Bars are distances to the best published result on each test (percent scores above chance, Arena ratings as win rate against the leader, open-ended values on a log scale). Raw values as the publishers report them.

Open GPT-6 Astra

Scores

Every test, every source

The best published run per benchmark, the raw value as the publisher reports it, who produced the number, how close it comes to the best published result on that test, and where the model sits among every model scored on it. Percent scores are read above chance, Arena ratings as a win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. A test with too few models to compare against is shown but not counted, and so is an archived test: one whose publisher no longer covers new models.

Category means

  • Reasoning59.5 · 2/8
  • Knowledgebeside31.6 · 1/1
  • Coding—
  • Math96.1 · 1/4
  • Agentic—
  • Multimodal—
  • Human preference—
  • Long context—

Mean · tests taken of the category's comparable tests. A faded category either rests on fewer than half of them or is a single-test category (marked “beside”), which is shown next to the Index and never averaged into it.

GPQA DiamondEpoch-runReasoning

89.6%

90.5% of the best (96.4%), above chance
51th percentile of 96 · n = 198

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Chess PuzzlesEpoch-runReasoning

26.0%

28.4% of the best (79.0%), above chance
31th percentile of 76 · n = 100

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SimpleQA VerifiedEpoch-runKnowledge

29.7%

31.6% of the best (94.0%)
16th percentile of 75 · n = 1,000

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub

96.1%

96.1% of the best (100.0%)
63th percentile of 98 · n = 45

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub

Top of the leaderboard

Compare with its neighbours.

Theo

The best models, ranked here, working inside Theo.

29 of the models on this page run inside Theo today. Theo picks the right one for each step and always shows which engine answered.