Answer the same prompt as a rival model; real users vote blind on which answer they prefer.
1,474
45% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
#24 of 92
board 2026-09-02
Source: ArenaGoogleUnited States· released Dec 2025
Ranked #26, 37.5% behind the frontier on average.
Google, United States. One of 14 models from this lab on the Index.
Snapshot September 8, 2026
OpenCharts Index
62.5
Ranked #26 (21 to 30) of 36 · 37.5% behind the frontier on average · 18 comparable tests · 3 counting categories
Drop any single test and the Index lands between 57.0 and 66.6, anywhere from #21 to #30. Neighbours inside that range are ties.
5 of 8 hardest tests · share of the frontier
Distance to today's frontier on the hardest tests. Not a measure of intelligence.
What it's known for
Strongest in reasoning (71.8) and agentic (70.1). It trails the frontier most in math, 54.3% behind on average. No comparable result yet in long context. Between 35% and 40% behind the best published results, on average. Drop any single test and it would sit anywhere from #21 to #30.
Strongest category
Reasoning
Hard, novel problems: graduate science, abstract puzzles, expert exams.
71.8
Mean of 4 of the category's 6 comparable tests. Counts toward the Index.
Best single result
Solve competition mathematics problems that have a single exact integer answer.
95.6%
95.6% of the best (100.0%) · #19 of 78.
Olympiad-style problems need long, careful chains of reasoning, and there is no partial credit.
Where it trails
Write a complete, rigorous proof, graded for rigor rather than for a final answer.
15.0%
85.0% behind the best published result (100.0%) · #44 of 61.
A proof shows the reasoning itself. A right answer with a wrong argument scores nothing.
Not measured yet
No comparable result yet in this category. A blank is a blank, never a zero, and it does not lower the Index.
Covered, but not averaged into the Index:
See it at work
Every test it has taken, by category, with the kind of task it faced, who produced the number and where the result landed against the best published one. The examples are original and illustrative, never items from the datasets themselves.
Human preference · mean 90.4 across 1 comparable test · a single-test category, shown beside the Index and never averaged into it
Answer the same prompt as a rival model; real users vote blind on which answer they prefer.
1,474
45% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
#24 of 92
board 2026-09-02
Source: ArenaEvery result is read against the best published one on its test: percent scores as a share of the best above chance, Arena ratings as the expected win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. Sitting a harder exam never lowers a model. Every number links to the publisher that produced it.
Head to head
Choose a rival. Every counted test both have taken appears side by side as a share of the best published result on that test, with the category means above. A win is a higher share; a gap under 2 points is a tie, because one item on a 45-problem exam is 2.2 points and publishers' own standard errors are of that order.
Gemini 3 Flash
#26·Index 62.5C
0 : 11
wins · 0 ties · 11 shared
GPT-6 Astra
#1·Index 99.0A+
GPT-6 Astra comes out ahead on 11 of the 11 tests both have taken.
Category means
Reasoning
Knowledge
Coding
Math
Agentic
Multimodal
Human preference
Shared tests · biggest gaps first
Bars are distances to the best published result on each test (percent scores above chance, Arena ratings as win rate against the leader, open-ended values on a log scale). Raw values as the publishers report them.
Open GPT-6 AstraScores
The best published run per benchmark, the raw value as the publisher reports it, who produced the number, how close it comes to the best published result on that test, and where the model sits among every model scored on it. Percent scores are read above chance, Arena ratings as a win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. A test with too few models to compare against is shown but not counted.
Category means
Mean · tests taken of the category's comparable tests. A faded category either rests on fewer than half of them or is a single-test category (marked “beside”), which is shown next to the Index and never averaged into it.
89.4%
91.0% of the best (95.8%), above chance
58th percentile of 78 · n = 198
preview · high
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub33.6%
35.4% of the best (95.0%)
38th percentile of 51 · n = 120
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub84.7%
86.0% of the best (98.5%)
44th percentile of 51 · n = 100
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub61.1%
74.6% of the best (81.9%)
53th percentile of 46
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub66.8%
88.4% of the best (75.6%)
89th percentile of 57 · n = 1,000
preview · high
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub75.4%
90.3% of the best (83.5%)
56th percentile of 26 · n = 500
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub61.6%
66.3% of the best (92.9%)
62th percentile of 69
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub1,438
11% expected win rate against the board leader (1,797)
46th percentile of 86
board 2026-09-05
Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset95.6%
95.6% of the best (100.0%)
71th percentile of 78 · n = 45
preview · high
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub51.2%
54.7% of the best (93.7%)
40th percentile of 61 · n = 290
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub17.1%
17.5% of the best (97.6%)
26th percentile of 51 · n = 48
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub15.0%
15.0% of the best (100.0%)
27th percentile of 61
preview · reasoning effort: high
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub64.3%
75.9% of the best (84.7%)
77th percentile of 40
preview · agent: Junie CLI
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub24.0%
50.6% of the best (47.4%)
50th percentile of 49
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub$3,635
63.8% of the best ($11,182) on a log scale
38th percentile of 53
preview
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub49.8%
90.1% of the best (55.3%)
67th percentile of 19 · n = 100
preview · low
Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub1,272
44% expected win rate against the board leader (1,313)
62th percentile of 54
board 2026-08-27
Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset1,474
45% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
73th percentile of 92
board 2026-09-02
Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard DatasetNearby on the leaderboard

28 of the models on this page run inside Theo today. Theo picks the right one for each step and always shows which engine answered.