All models

OpenAIUnited States· released Aug 2025· open weights

GPT-OSS 120B

Provisional: 12 comparable tests so far. Ranked once it reaches 6 across 3 counting categories.

OpenAI, United States. One of 26 models from this lab on the Index.

Third-party publishedLow confidence (thin coverage)
Theo

Available in Theo as Theo Open Core

Theo orchestrates it for the steps it does best and always shows which engine answered.

Use it in Theo

Snapshot September 8, 2026

OpenCharts Index

27.8

Provisional: not enough comparable tests or counting categories to rank yet · 12 comparable tests · 2 counting categories

Drop any single test and the Index lands between 21.5 and 34.1.

HARD SET

Needs more results (2 of 8 so far)

Averaging 38.0 on the 2 it has; the score opens at 4 of 8.

Distance to today's frontier on the hardest tests. Not a measure of intelligence.

What it's known for

GPT-OSS 120B, in 12 results.

Strongest in reasoning (34.1) and agentic (21.5). It trails the frontier most in agentic, 78.5% behind on average. No comparable results yet in knowledge, multimodal and long context. Below 40% of the best published results, on average.

Strongest category

Reasoning

Hard, novel problems: graduate science, abstract puzzles, expert exams.

34.1

Mean of 3 of the category's 6 comparable tests. Counts toward the Index.

Best single result

Mock AIME 2024–2025

Solve competition mathematics problems that have a single exact integer answer.

88.9%

88.9% of the best (100.0%) · #41 of 78.

Olympiad-style problems need long, careful chains of reasoning, and there is no partial credit.

Where it trails

Vending-Bench 2

Run a simulated vending business for a year: ordering, pricing and cash flow. The score is the final balance.

$-22

100.0% behind the best published result ($11,182) on a log scale · #44 of 53.

Long-horizon decisions whose consequences compound. It exposes models that drift or forget.

Not measured yet

No comparable result yet in these 3 categories. A blank is a blank, never a zero, and it does not lower the Index.

  • Knowledge
  • Multimodal
  • Long context

Covered, but not averaged into the Index:

  • Coding3 of 7 tests · needs 4 · mean 54.0
  • Math1 of 5 tests · needs 3 · mean 88.9
  • Human preferencesingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 58.2
Every score, with its source

See it at work

What GPT-OSS 120B was asked to do, and how it did.

Every test it has taken, by category, with the kind of task it faced, who produced the number and where the result landed against the best published one. The examples are original and illustrative, never items from the datasets themselves.

Math · mean 88.9 across 1 comparable test · not counted toward the Index yet (fewer than half the category's tests)

Solve competition mathematics problems that have a single exact integer answer.

88.9%

88.9% of the best (100.0%)
#41 of 78 · n = 45

high

45 problems: one problem is 2.2 points, so gaps of a few points are within noise.

Source: Epoch AI (internal runs)

Every result is read against the best published one on its test: percent scores as a share of the best above chance, Arena ratings as the expected win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. Sitting a harder exam never lowers a model. Every number links to the publisher that produced it.

Head to head

GPT-OSS 120B against whoever you pick.

Choose a rival. Every counted test both have taken appears side by side as a share of the best published result on that test, with the category means above. A win is a higher share; a gap under 2 points is a tie, because one item on a 45-problem exam is 2.2 points and publishers' own standard errors are of that order.

GPT-OSS 120B

provisional·Index 27.8F

0 : 6

wins · 0 ties · 6 shared

GPT-6 Astra

#1·Index 99.0A+

GPT-6 Astra comes out ahead on 6 of the 6 tests both have taken.

Category means

  • Reasoning

    34.1
    99.6
  • Knowledge

    100.0
  • Coding

    54.0
    97.7
  • Math

    88.9
    99.8
  • Agentic

    21.5
    98.5
  • Human preference

    58.2

Shared tests · biggest gaps first

Bars are distances to the best published result on each test (percent scores above chance, Arena ratings as win rate against the leader, open-ended values on a log scale). Raw values as the publishers report them.

Open GPT-6 Astra

Scores

Every test, every source

The best published run per benchmark, the raw value as the publisher reports it, who produced the number, how close it comes to the best published result on that test, and where the model sits among every model scored on it. Percent scores are read above chance, Arena ratings as a win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. A test with too few models to compare against is shown but not counted.

Category means

  • Reasoning34.1 · 3/6
  • Knowledge
  • Coding54.0 · 3/7
  • Math88.9 · 1/5
  • Agentic21.5 · 4/8
  • Multimodal
  • Human preferencebeside58.2 · 1/1
  • Long context

Mean · tests taken of the category's comparable tests. A faded category either rests on fewer than half of them or is a single-test category (marked “beside”), which is shown next to the Index and never averaged into it.

GPQA DiamondEpoch-runReasoning

75.8%

71.7% of the best (95.8%), above chance
8th percentile of 78 · n = 198

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SimpleBenchLeaderboardReasoning

22.1%

27.0% of the best (81.9%)
0th percentile of 46

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
CritPtLeaderboardReasoning

1.1%

3.5% of the best (32.3%)
18th percentile of 78

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Aider PolyglotLeaderboardCoding

41.8%

47.5% of the best (88.0%)
0th percentile of 5 · n = 225

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SciCodeLeaderboardCoding

38.9%

62.7% of the best (62.0%)
13th percentile of 73 · n = 338

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
WeirdMLLeaderboardCoding

48.2%

51.9% of the best (92.9%)
31th percentile of 69

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub

88.9%

88.9% of the best (100.0%)
43th percentile of 78 · n = 45

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Terminal-BenchLeaderboardAgentic

18.7%

22.1% of the best (84.7%)
8th percentile of 40

agent: Terminus 2

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
METR Time HorizonLeaderboardAgentic

42 min

53.8% of the best (17.4 h) on a log scale
0th percentile of 14

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
APEX-AgentsLeaderboardAgentic

4.7%

9.9% of the best (47.4%)
6th percentile of 49

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Vending-Bench 2LeaderboardAgentic

$-22

0.0% of the best ($11,182) on a log scale
0th percentile of 53

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Text ArenaLeaderboardHuman preference

1,352

29% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
3th percentile of 92

board 2026-09-02

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset

Top of the leaderboard

Compare with its neighbours.

Theo

The best models, ranked here, working inside Theo.

28 of the models on this page run inside Theo today. Theo picks the right one for each step and always shows which engine answered.