All benchmarks
Agentic

EBR-bench

Ten playthroughs of Earthborne Rangers, a little-known card-based board game, through a text interface: eight to practice and take notes, two that count. The score is the share of 21 objectives, which the model has to discover for itself, reached in the better of the two scored games. Epoch AI runs it five times per model.

Long-horizon tasks with tools: terminals, desktops, browsers, whole jobs. One of 6 comparable tests in agentic, a category the Index averages.

Read with care. An outside audit of the first version (Generality Labs) found it well built as a game test but a limited measure of learning from experience. Older models were scored under earlier settings and may not be directly comparable.

Publisher: Epoch AI (internal runs)

What a model is asked to do

Play a little-known card-based adventure game ten times through a text interface, keeping notes, and score on the last two games.

For exampleNobody tells you what earns points. In the practice games you work out that helping a traveler and reaching the ridge both count, write that down, and plan the scored games around it.

Why it matters. Getting better at an unfamiliar job by doing it is what people do in their first weeks at work. This checks whether practice helps a model at all.

The example is original and illustrative, not an item from the dataset.

Models scored here
30
Who produced the numbers
Run by Epoch AI
Items graded
n = 21 (4.8% each)
Best published result
90.5%
Newest release covered
November 9, 2026 (active)
License
CC BY 4.0 (via Epoch AI)
Direction
Higher is better
Scale
Published as a share of items solved. For the Index, each score is a share of the best published result (90.5%), so the frontier reads 100. Guessing earns nothing on this test, so no chance correction applies.
Provenance
Epoch AI ran the evaluation itself, under settings it documents per model, and publishes the log of every answer.

Snapshot November 10, 2026

Ranking on this test

30 models on EBR-bench

Best published run per model, and how close each one comes to the best published result on this test (the frontier reads 100). Every number links to the publisher that produced it. Internal runs are marked and carry their run details on the model page. One item on this test is 4.8 points, so read gaps smaller than that as noise.

#ModelScoreProduced by
1Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic90.5%Epoch-run
2GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI78.1%Epoch-run
3GPT-6 AstraOpenAI76.2%Epoch-run
4Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic71.4%Epoch-run
5Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle64.8%Epoch-run
6Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic57.1%Epoch-run
7GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI54.3%Epoch-run
8GPT-6 SolOpenAI53.3%Epoch-run
9Claude Opus 5Anthropic45.7%Epoch-run
10GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI44.8%Epoch-run
11Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic43.8%Epoch-run
12Claude Fable 5Anthropic39.5%Epoch-run
13GPT-5.5OpenAI34.3%Epoch-run
14Muse WonderMeta31.4%Epoch-run
15Grok 4.6xAI30.5%Epoch-run
16Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic28.6%Epoch-run
17GPT-5.4OpenAI25.4%Epoch-run
18GPT-5.2OpenAI23.0%Epoch-run
19Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic19.0%Epoch-run
20Mistral Large 4Mistral AI18.1%Epoch-run
21Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle14.3%Epoch-run
22Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic14.3%Epoch-run
23Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic12.7%Epoch-run
24GPT-5OpenAI12.7%Epoch-run
25GLM 5.2Zhipu AI9.5%Epoch-run
26Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba9.5%Epoch-run
27Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic7.9%Epoch-run
28Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle4.8%Epoch-run
29Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI2.4%Epoch-run
30Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic2.4%Epoch-run
Theo

The best models, ranked here, working inside Theo.

29 of the models on this page run inside Theo today. Theo picks the right one for each step and always shows which engine answered.